On the back you can see the remaining eight Micron NW913 NAND devices of the SATA3 SSD with 2TB capacity and the Silicon Motion SMI 2258H Controller IC as well as the second Micron D9STQ Cache device. As we will see in the benchmarks, Crucial was able to find a good solution with the MX500. The MX300 was equipped with the 3D TLC NAND and the BX200 was equipped with a simple TLC NAND, which could only maintain a high write performance via the SLC cache size.
HOW TO OVER PROVISION CRUCIAL MX200 STORAGE EXECUTIVE WINDOWS
The differences between TLC, SLC and MLC we have already explained extensively in the Windows Practical testing of Crucial BX200 480GB SSD. You can see a Micron D9STQ 1GB cache module and the eight of the sixteen Micron NW913 64 Layer 3D TLC NAND modules of the SSD with a total capacity of 2000GB. Here you can see the small SSD board in the case together with the SSD cover. The case of the Crucial MX500 SSD was provided again with screws.
If required, the supplied 7mm can be mounted on a 9.5mm adapter frame or sticked on to remain compatible with the 9.5mm height (e.g. The MX500 SSD, like the previous Crucial MX300, MX200, BX300, BX200, BX100 and MX100, is manufactured in the flatter height, which in contrast to the predecessor SSDs is only 7mm and no longer 9.5mm. The two SATA3 connections for power supply and data connection can be seen in the following picture on the left side. The back shows the label of the 2.5″ Crucial MX500 SSD with some technical data and the firmware version M3CR023, which was pre-installed. … which looks almost identical to the previous Crucial MX300 SSD.
Here you can see the front of the 2.5″ Crucial MX500 2TB SSD …
0 kommentar(er)
